Sphere Medical, an innovative company in critical care monitoring and diagnostics equipment, announces that its Proxima™ bedside blood gas monitoring system is compatible with Philips IntelliVue Patient Monitoring Systems through the Philips IntelliBridge Interface Module. Sphere Medical’s Proxima is an acute respiratory and metabolic monitoring system used in critical care settings which supports proactive patient care, particularly at critical times. It enables rapid and frequent blood gas, glucose and electrolyte measurements directly at the bedside without the caregiver leaving the patient. Philips compatibility means that Proxima’s results can be recorded and displayed alongside other critical monitoring information, such as blood pressure, ECG, EEG, respiratory rate, cardiac output and temperature. Such consolidated information gives a comprehensive patient overview, enhancing patient management. With the increasing adoption of electronic data record systems in critical care settings, Philips compatibility will also give Proxima customers a very simple means of integrating their data into electronic medical record systems (EMR). Commenting on the additional point-of-care connectivity functionality of the Proxima bedside blood gas analyser, Wolfgang Rencken, CEO of Sphere Medical said, “We are extremely pleased with the confirmation that Proxima is compatible with Philips IntelliVue patient monitors through the Philips IntelliBridge EC10 medical device interfacing module. Many of our customers use Philips monitoring and data management systems and this connectivity further helps the practical implementation of Proxima as an acute respiratory and metabolic monitoring device in critical care settings.”
www.spheremedical.com
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:36:53Sphere Medical confirms compatibility of bedside blood gas monitoring system with leading global monitoring company
Severe acute liver failure (ALF), a rare but life-threatening illness, is associated with high death rates if patients don’t receive timely treatment or a liver transplant. Unlike the heart or the kidneys, there is no established mechanical device to replace the liver’s function. Now, University of Maryland School of Medicine (UM SOM) researchers report that a device that removes toxins from the blood can also effectively provide a bridge to liver transplantation or buy time for a traumatically injured liver to heal, suggesting broader uses for the device than previously thought. The researchers, present the largest series of cases in the United States in which the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System has been used as temporary liver replacement for ALF. MARS can be likened to a dialysis machine for the liver. It essentially “washes” a patient’s blood with a solution containing albumin – normally produced by healthy livers – to remove toxins such as bile acids, ammonia, bilirubin, copper, iron and phenols from the blood. “We’ve found in the use of MARS that we’re able to get trauma patients with massive liver injury to recovery and, in patients who are deemed good transplant candidates, get them to transplant with excellent survivals,” says lead researcher, Steven I. Hanish, MD, associate professor of surgery at UM SOM and a liver transplant surgeon at the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the device to clear the liver after overdoses and poisonings, and reduce the effects of brain swelling related to liver failure. However, it is not yet FDA-approved as a bridge to transplant.
University of Maryland School of Medicine http://tinyurl.com/ya32cuxm
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:37:01New use of blood cleaning device saves high-risk patients with liver failure
University of Sheffield scientists discover drug used for arthritis could be used to treat blood cancer Every year 3,000 people in the UK are diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera (PV), a type of blood cancer which causes an overproduction of red blood cells. Patients suffer with itching, headaches, weight loss, fatigue and night sweats. Current treatments do not slow the disease progression and provide little relief from symptoms. Dr Martin Zeidler, from the University of Sheffield’s Department of Biomedical Science, working with colleagues from the Department of Haematology at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital, and funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) have discovered that methotrexate (MTX) – a drug on the World Health Organisation list of essential medicines and commonly used to treat arthritis – works by directly inhibiting the molecular pathway responsible for causing disease. Initial tests were carried out on fruit fly cells to screen for small molecules that modulate JAK/STAT signalling – a signalling pathway whose misregulation is central to the development in humans of Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), the collective term for progressive blood cancers like PV. Further testing in human cells showed that methotrexate acts as a potent suppressor of JAK/STAT pathway activation – even in cells carrying the mutated gene responsible for MPNs in patients. Dr Martin Zeidler said the latest tests on mice were entirely consistent with the cell-based studies. The tests showed low-dose MTX suppresses JAK/STAT pathway activity and is able to normalise both the raised blood counts and the increase in spleen size associated with the disease in these mice. “We have now shown pretty conclusively that we can use this approach to treat mouse models of human MPNs, results which provide a much more tangible prospect of success in humans,” he said. “Repurposing MTX has the potential to provide a new, molecularly targeted treatment for MPN patients within a budget accessible to healthcare systems throughout the world – a development that may ultimately provide substantial clinical and health economic benefits.” MTX has been used for 35 years to treat inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and psoriasis. Even though the mechanisms by which MTX acts in these diseases had not previously been understood, the safety and effectiveness of MTX is well documented and many millions of patients regularly take the drug. Strikingly, diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis all feature inflammatory processes driven by JAK/STAT activity and the effectiveness of MTX in these inflammatory diseases may well be a consequence of its ability to dampen the JAK/STAT pathway.
The University of Sheffield
www.sheffield.ac.uk/news/nr/blood-cancer-athritis-1.720503
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:37:09Arthritis drug could treat blood cancer patients
A new paper finds that testing for cervical cancer using HPV testing in addition to the Pap smear is unlikely to detect cancer cases that wouldn’t be found using HPV testing alone. The main goal of cervical screening programms is to detect and treat pre-cancer before cancer develops. Cytology-based screening, known as the Pap test or Pap smear, is used to detect abnormal cells. The Pap test can also find noncancerous conditions, such as infections and inflammation. Cervical cancer screening guidelines have changed dramatically over the last 15 years, following introduction of testing for the dozen high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types that cause virtually all cervical cancer and its precursors. Despite more research into HPV, and the introduction of preventive HPV vaccines, screening will remain important and comprise many millions of tests annually for decades to come. But improved screening methods have also introduced some confusion, even controversy. HPV testing is more sensitive than the Pap test for detecting pre-cancer. The HPV test captures the known cancer causing viruses, but there are gynaecologists who believe that there may be unknown cancer causing viruses and so continue to do the Pap smear (plus HPV testing). However, reports of rare HPV-negative, Pap-test-positive cancers are motivating continued use of both tests (cotesting) despite increased testing costs. An HPV test, in which doctors test a cervicovaginal specimen for the presence of the nucleic acids of carcinogenic types of HPV, is more sensitive than the Pap test (a microscopic examination of exfoliated cells) for detection of pre-cancers. Thus, if a single screening method were chosen to complement HPV vaccination, primary HPV testing likely would gradually supplant the Pap test. In the US, an interim guidance issued by a committee of experts from several clinical societies recommended primary HPV testing every three years, the same as the Pap test. Alternatively, current guidelines recommend cotesting but, in recognition of the additional reassurance provided by this approach compared with the Pap test alone, the screening interval is extended to every five years. Draft guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force recently recommended either primary HPV testing every five years or the Pap test every three years for women 30 to 64, and did not recommend cotesting. The accumulated evidence supports inclusion of HPV testing in screening; thus, the main choice moving forward is between cotesting and primary HPV testing alone. Researchers were searching for realistic performance data to quantify the additional benefit of the Pap test component of cotesting, as the costs of intensive screening of all women using two screening tests are substantial. In January 2003, just prior to US FDA approval of HPV and Pap test cotesting in mid-2003 and interim guidelines in 2004, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large integrated healthcare organization, introduced three-year cotesting in women aged 30 years and older. Kaiser Permanente has now screened over a million women by cotesting. This remains the most extensive experience of HPV testing incorporated into routine screening in the world. Researchers here quantified the detection of cervical precancer and cancer by cotesting compared with HPV testing alone at Kaiser Permanente, where 1,208,710 women have undergone triennial cervical cotesting since 2003. Screening histories preceding cervical cancers (n=623) and precancers (n=5,369) were examined to assess the relative contribution of the Pap test and HPV test components in identifying cases. The analysis found that HPV testing identified more women subsequently diagnosed with cancer and precancer than the Pap test. HPV testing was statistically significantly more likely to be positive for cancer at any time point, except within 12 months. HPV-negative/ Pap test-positive results preceded only small fractions of cases of precancer (3.5%) and cancer (5.9%); these cancers were more likely to be regional or distant stage than other cases. The researchers conclude that the added sensitivity of cotesting versus HPV alone for detection of treatable cancer affected extremely few women.
Bioengineer.orghttps://tinyurl.com/y7x5hfp2
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:36:47HPV testing is better than the Pap test at detecting cervical cancer
Video laryngoscopy did not improve first-pass orotracheal intubation rates in the intensive care unit (ICU) and was associated with higher rates of life-threatening complications, in a multicentre study in France. “Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the systematic use of video laryngoscopy for intubation in the ICU,” Dr. Jean Baptiste Lascarrou of District Hospital Center in La Roche Sur Yon told Reuters Health by email. Part of the reason could be that, in contrast to the operating room, “intubation in the ICU is frequently performed by residents and patients are in acute respiratory and/or circulatory failure.” In 2015 and 2016, Dr. Lascarrou and colleagues at seven ICUs in France randomized 371 adults (mean age, 63; 37% women) to intubation with the McGrath Mac Videolaryngoscope or the Macintosh Laryngoscope. The proportion of patients with successful first-pass intubation did not differ significantly between the groups (67.7% for video versus 70.3% for direct laryngoscopy; P=0.60). Similarly, the proportion of first-attempt intubations performed by non-experts – mainly residents – did not differ between the groups (84.4% with video versus 83.2% with direct laryngoscopy; P=0.76). For video laryngoscopy, first intubation attempts were successful more often when performed by experts (55 of 60 patients, or 91.7%) versus non-experts (201 of 311 patients, or 64.6%; P=0.001) Median time to successful intubation was three minutes for both groups (P=0.95). The proportion of patients with severe life-threatening complications was higher in the video group compared to the direct laryngoscopy group (9.5% versus 2.8%, respectively; P=0.01). No significant between-group difference was found for mild-to-moderate life-threatening complications. Dr. Lascarrou noted that “the frequency of life-threatening complications was relatively low overall compared to older studies, probably due to the systematic application of an intubation protocol that includes pre-oxygenation and neuromuscular blockade use.” Nonetheless, he concluded, “Clinicians have a long way to go before the intubation process is safer in the ICU.” Editorialists Drs. Brian O’Gara and Daniel Talmor, from the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, told Reuters Health, “This trial illustrates an important concept in modern medicine. The proliferation and increased availability of sophisticated devices such as the video laryngoscope with proven benefit in limited populations may sometimes lead clinicians to assume that such benefits can be applied to larger patient groups.” “Studies such as (this) are important so that clinicians who may be using such devices can be informed as to their potential benefit or harm in patient groups who are different from the originally intended population,” they said by email.
Medscapehttp://tinyurl.com/y9ddlxov
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:36:56Video no better than direct laryngoscopy for ICU intubations
University of Adelaide researchers have shown that it is possible for stroke patients to improve motor function using special training involving connecting brain signals with a computer. In a “proof-of-principle” study, the researchers described how this brain-computer interface (BCI) produced a 36% improvement in motor function of a stroke-damaged hand. The BCI measures brain electrical signal on the surface of the scalp. Every time a subject imagines performing a specific motor function, for example grasping an object, the BCI takes those electrical signals and transmits them to a computer. Then an advanced mathematical algorithm interprets the brain signals and accordingly supplies a sensory feedback via a robotic manipulator. “In the majority of strokes, the area of the brain that sends motor commands to the muscles becomes partly damaged and thereby degrades motor functions of the affected parts,” says Dr Sam Darvishi, who completed the work during his PhD in the University of Adelaide’s School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, under the supervision of Associate Professor Mathias Baumert and Professor Derek Abbott. “During the early phases of motor learning (such as when we are toddlers) our brain and body learn how to work in harmony when the brain commands the target muscles and then receives feedback via seeing and feeling each body movement. After a stroke the brain needs to re-train the lost skills. “BCIs have been proposed as an alternate therapy for stroke patients. They have shown some level of promise but, to date, haven’t been particularly effective. “Our theory is that to achieve clinical results with BCIs we need to have the right feedback to the brain at the right time; we need to provide the same feedback that we receive during natural motor learning, when we are seeing and feeling the body’s movement. We also found there should be a short delay between the brain activation and the activation of target muscles.” The researchers designed a specific BCI to meet these requirements. In a single case study of one patient they achieved 36% improvement in hand motor function in just 10 training sessions of 30 minutes each. “This was only a single patient so we can’t generalise the outcome to a whole stroke population,” says Dr Darvishi. “However it certainly shows enough promise for a larger study of stroke patients to see if this could be a feasible therapy for stroke rehabilitation. This would be a major step towards helping stroke patients recover from debilitating damage.”
University of Adelaide www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news94602.html
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:37:04Stroke patient improvement with a brain-computer interface
A new randomized clinical trial of a pilot program found that a brief in-person intervention can improve psychosocial health in a particularly vulnerable population – adolescents and young adults living with cancer. Psychosocial stress from cancer is common and is often a major detriment to quality of life. For example, one type of stress is anxiety over how to navigate the demands of the disease. Although many programs provide some level of psychosocial support for patients and families, very few provide standardized tools to manage this stress. The intervention, called Promoting Resilience in Stress Management, or PRISM, improved resilience and quality of life, increased hope, and lowered distress in the majority of patients. “The experience of cancer is stressful in all realms, but we tend to focus more on physical symptoms than the equally important social and emotional challenges,” said lead study author Abby R. Rosenberg, MD, Director of Palliative Care and Resilience Research at Seattle Children’s Research Institute. “This is particularly true for adolescents and young adults who already struggle with normal developmental changes. When you throw cancer into the mix, it can become much harder.” PRISM emerged from a theory of resilience that puts forth three sets of resources that can help manage adversity: internal resources, such as stress-management or mindfulness skills; community resources, such as social support; and existential resources, such as spirituality and the search for purpose. In prior research, the investigators found that internal and existential resources were more teachable than tapping community resources. PRISM was tested in an earlier feasibility study with young patients with either diabetes or cancer. In this clinical trial, 100 English-speaking patients ages 12 to 25 years who were diagnosed with new or newly recurrent cancer were randomly assigned to receive PRISM or usual psychosocial care. The intervention was delivered in four 30-minute to hour-long one-on-one sessions with a trained research associate, followed by a family meeting. PRISM cultivated internal resilience resources that strengthen stress management and goal-setting, as well as existential resilience resources that strengthen cognitive reframing and meaning-making. “Meaning-making is basically deriving some personal perspective or purpose from adversity,” said Dr. Rosenberg. “For example, we found that many young cancer patients in our study identified things for which they were grateful, despite their cancer experience.” Regardless of which group they were in, all participants received standard psychosocial supportive care, including a dedicated social worker and access to psychologists, child-life specialists, and other experts in adolescent and young adult oncology care, as needed. Patients completed surveys at enrollment and six months later. The authors found that the intervention improved psychosocial well-being. Specifically, among the 74 participants who remained alive and well enough to complete the 6-month survey (36 in the intervention group and 38 in the usual care group), those who received the intervention had improvements in resilience, cancer-related quality of life, hope, and distress compared with those who received usual psychosocial care. In addition, the incidence of depression was much lower in the intervention group compared with the usual care group (6% vs. 21%). All but four of the PRISM recipients chose to participate in the family meeting following their one-on-one skills-training sessions. “We included the family meeting because teens told us they wanted to share with their parents, and parents told us they wanted to know what their children had learned,” said Dr. Rosenberg. “While the specific impact of this meeting is yet to be determined, we hope it will guide families so that there is continued support of teen or young adult patients.”
“We need to include a much larger cultural demographic in future studies,” said Dr. Rosenberg. “Beyond that, we also need to determine if this type of intervention could translate to other centers where usual care may not be as comprehensive as what we have here.” The investigators would also like to test PRISM in patients with advanced cancers and possibly expand to other diseases, such as cystic fibrosis. American Society of Clinical Oncology www.asco.org/about-asco/press-center/news-releases/resilience-intervention-improves-well-being-young-patients
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:36:51Resilience intervention improves well-being in young patients with cancer
Live phone calls significantly outperform text messages and letters as a way to remind patients to complete and return at-home screening tests for colon cancer, according to new research in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. The study included more than 2,700 patients who receive care in safety-net clinics and who were overdue for colon cancer screening. Colon cancer screening is recommended for everyone ages 50-75. The patients were sent test kits by mail, and 10 percent mailed back their completed tests within three weeks. Those who did not return the kits within that period were assigned to one of seven reminder interventions. These included a phone call from a clinic outreach worker (live call), two automated calls, two text messages, a single reminder letter, or a combination of these strategies. The live phone call intervention was most effective, resulting in 32 percent of patients in this group completing and returning their test kit within six months. The text message intervention was the least effective — only 17 percent of patients in this group completed and mailed back their test. "We knew that these patients are not as text savvy as younger patients, but we didn’t expect text messaging to do so poorly, compared to the other strategies," said Gloria Coronado, PhD, lead author and cancer disparities researcher with the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research. "Text messaging is a relatively inexpensive way to send patient reminders, but for this group it was also relatively ineffective." Patients received the various reminders in their preferred language. Phone calls were the most effective strategy for all patients, but English speakers were more likely to respond to the single live phone call, while Spanish speakers were more likely to respond to the combination of a live call and two automated calls. People assigned to receive the live call and the automated calls had more contacts with the health care system. It appears that Spanish speakers appreciated this additional contact, while English speakers may have been more likely to disregard the additional automated calls, said Coronado. "The phone calls may help to build trust or confianza, which is an important value and motivator for care-seeking among Hispanics," added Ricardo Jimenez, MD, co-author and medical director of Sea Mar Community Health Centers in Seattle, where the study took place. "Our study shows that one reminder intervention doesn’t necessarily work for all patients. We need to design interventions tailored to the patient’s language and cultural preference," explained Coronado. The authors believe it is the first study to rigorously test the effectiveness of reminder strategies in a safety net system among patients with different language preferences.
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:36:59Phone calls work better to remind people about colon cancer screening
A UBC Okanagan researcher has discovered a new artificial bone design that can be customized and made with a 3D printer for stronger, safer and more effective bone replacements. Hossein Montazerian, research assistant with UBC Okanagan’s School of Engineering, has identified a way to model and create artificial bone grafts that can be custom printed. Montazerian says human bones are incredibly resilient, but when things go wrong, replacing them can be a painful process, requiring multiple surgeries. “When designing artificial bone scaffolds it’s a fine balance between something that is porous enough to mix with natural bone and connective tissue, but at the same time strong enough for patients to lead a normal life,” says Montazerian. “We’ve identified a design that strikes that balance and can be custom built using a 3D printer.” Traditional bone grafting is used in medicine to treat anything from traumatic fractures to defects, and requires moving bone from one part of the body to another. But Montazerian says his artificial bone grafts could be custom printed to potentially fit any patient and wouldn’t require transplanting existing bone fragments. In his research, Montazerian analysed 240 different bone graft designs and focused on just the ones that were both porous and strong. He printed those that performed the best using a 3D printer and then ran physical tests to determine how effective they would be under load in the real world. “A few of the structures really stood out,” Montazerian adds. “The best designs were up to 10 times stronger than the others and since they have properties that are much more similar to natural bone, they’re less likely to cause problems over the long term.” Montazerian and his collaborators are already working on the next generation of designs that will use a mix of two or more structures. “We hope to produce bone grafts that will be ultra-porous, where the bone and connective tissues meet and are extra-strong at the points under the most stress. The ultimate goal is to produce a replacement that almost perfectly mimics real bone.” While his bone graft designs are well on their way, Montazerian says the technology still needs some advances before it can be used clinically. For example, he says other researchers in the field are starting to refine biomaterials that won’t be rejected by the body and that can be printed with the very fine 3D details that his designs require. “This solution has enormous potential and the next step will be to test how our designs behave in real biological systems,” he says. “I hope to see this kind of technology clinically implemented for real patients in the near future.”
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:37:06Potential of artificial bones made with 3D printer
The treatment of left main coronary artery disease by percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a smaller risk of severe cardiovascular events than coronary artery bypass grafting in the weeks following surgery. A meta-analysis of several trials and nearly 5,000 patients revealed no differences in mortality between the two treatments. The finding is significant when it comes to selecting the form of treatment: percutaneous coronary intervention is less burdensome on the patient, as it does not require long-term hospitalization and enables rapid return to work. The prognosis of left main coronary artery disease is worse than in any other form of coronary artery disease. The treatment options include percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. In European and American treatment guidelines, coronary artery bypass grafting is generally regarded as the first-line treatment for severe left main coronary artery disease. However, some studies have suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-releasing stent implantation would also be a recommendable course of treatment in the severe form of the disease, but the evidence has been inconsistent. A new study by investigators from the University of Eastern Finland and Oulu University Hospital compared percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-releasing stent implantation and coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of left main coronary artery disease. The authors pooled evidence from six comparable, randomized, controlled trials involving 4,700 people. The researchers analysed all available randomized studies among patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, comparing their risk of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and other cardiovascular events at time points of 30 days, one year and three years after surgery. There were no differences between the treatments as regards the risk of death, or cardiac or cerebrovascular events. Percutaneous coronary intervention patients needed repetitive interventions more often over the years. According to the researchers, the findings suggest that percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-releasing stent implantation should be more frequently considered as a treatment option for patients suffering from left main coronary artery disease. There are no differences in mortality between patients of percutaneous coronary intervention and patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, and as percutaneous coronary intervention is less burdensome on the patient both from the viewpoint of quality of life and functional capacity, it is an option worth considering.
University of East Finlandhttps://tinyurl.com/y75tll7d
https://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/logo-footer.png442003wmediahttps://interhospi.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/06/Component-6-–-1.png3wmedia2020-08-26 14:36:442020-08-26 14:36:45Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-justified treatment option also in severe coronary artery disease
We may ask you to place cookies on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience and to customise your relationship with our website.
Click on the different sections for more information. You can also change some of your preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may affect your experience on our websites and the services we can provide.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to provide the website, refusing them will affect the functioning of our site. You can always block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and block all cookies on this website forcibly. But this will always ask you to accept/refuse cookies when you visit our site again.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies, but to avoid asking you each time again to kindly allow us to store a cookie for that purpose. You are always free to unsubscribe or other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies, we will delete all cookies set in our domain.
We provide you with a list of cookies stored on your computer in our domain, so that you can check what we have stored. For security reasons, we cannot display or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser's security settings.
.
Google Analytics Cookies
These cookies collect information that is used in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customise our website and application for you to improve your experience.
If you do not want us to track your visit to our site, you can disable this in your browser here:
.
Other external services
We also use various external services such as Google Webfonts, Google Maps and external video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data such as your IP address, you can block them here. Please note that this may significantly reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will only be effective once you reload the page
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Maps Settings:
Google reCaptcha settings:
Vimeo and Youtube videos embedding:
.
Privacy Beleid
U kunt meer lezen over onze cookies en privacy-instellingen op onze Privacybeleid-pagina.